Millions of dollars have poured into bets on who will win the US election after a last-minute court ruling opened up gambling on the vote, upping the stakes on a too-close-to-call race that has already put voters on edge.
Contracts for a Harris victory were trading between 48 and 50 per cent in favour of the Democrat on Friday on Interactive Brokers, a firm that has taken advantage of a legal opening created earlier this month in the country’s long-running regulatory battle over election markets.
With just a month until the November 5 vote, markets opened after a court in Washington ruled that Kalshi, a start-up that has been trying to introduce political betting in the United States for years, could take wagers as legal appeals by regulators against the company continue.
Within days, more than US$6.3 million had been put on the line for the Harris-Trump match-up alone, with users also betting on control of the House and Senate.
It’s the latest turn in a years-long saga between the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and firms wishing to offer election betting – a legal practice in a number of other countries and one that some Americans participate in outside regulators’ oversight via offshore markets.
More than US$1.7 billion has been placed on the Harris-Trump match-up on one such offshore site, Polymarket, where Trump held a 54 to 45 advantage over Harris on Friday evening.
There is something bleakly inspiring about the fact that despite the total saturation of sports culture with the brand and business, there appears to be no way
When you work hard to save some money for college, you want to make sure the money is safe and growing at a good rate. What would you do if your
FARGO — Had a friend comment the other day that almost everything in the country the Mob once controlled is now merrily endorsed by the government
David Purdum, ESPN Staff WriterNov 14, 2024, 12:49 PM ETClose Joined ESPN in 2014 Journalist covering gambling industry since 2008The betting public is overwhe