Surely, the Las Vegas Raiders will pick a quarterback at No. 6 if one is available in the 2025 NFL draft. If either Shedeur Sanders or Cam Ward is on the board, most NFL experts think Pete Carroll and Chip Kelly will decide that a young franchise quarterback is their most important need. One NFL draft analyst, however, is not convinced. Jordan Plocher of Pro Football Focus thinks that Cam Ward will be there at No. 6, and the Raiders will pass on him.
Plocher thinks the Raiders will take Boise State running back Ashon Jeanty at No. 6, with Ward going one spot later at No. 7 to the New York Jets. That would be a wild turn of events, given that the Raiders have floundered for years based on deficient quarterback play. The Raiders won two late-season games to go from being a top-three draft-picking team to the No. 6 spot. Having a quarterback available at 6 would be a tremendous break for the Raiders. It’s really hard to see Las Vegas not selecting Cam Ward if he is somehow still available. The same would go for Shedeur Sanders.
One point to make about all of this: If some NFL draft experts are predicting the Raiders will not even draft a quarterback, it shows there’s no real consensus among NFL insiders about the Raiders’ true plans and intentions. If a draft analyst thinks the Raiders won’t take Cam Ward or Shedeur Sanders, that same analyst must obviously think Pete Carroll and Chip Kelly will pursue a veteran quarterback in a trade or free agency. The lack of an industry-wide consensus shows that the NFL doesn’t really know what Chip Kelly is actually thinking, deep down inside.
Let the NFL draft mystery linger.
During a recent episode of PFT Live, I said I was considering switching allegiances from the Vikings to the Eagles, if only
Free agency beckons this week, so here’s the way it looks before the stampede for the Brinks trucks begins. One trade at the top of Serby M
We shall mock draft until we can mock draft no more! Hold on, let’s tweak that: We shall mock draft until the final pick of the NFL Draft is made!Wait, one mo