Elon Musk, the billionaire CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, has been vocal for years about how to make things more efficient and reduce costs, particularly when it comes to government agencies. As his influence and power grow, Musk’s comments on how the federal government could eliminate some jobs have captured the attention of politicians, public employees, and defenders of governmental functions. Here’s a look at which jobs Musk has indicated may be on the chopping block in the near future and why.

Musk’s Vision for the Federal Government

Musk has been vocal in interviews and posts about his desire to shrink the size of government and streamline public spending. Specifically, he has suggested that too many government agencies are overstaffed with employees who do not contribute to the efficiency of the agency and waste taxpayer dollars. Musk has said that if he were ever in power, his administration would push to cut bureaucracy, particularly in areas he sees as ineffective.

READ ALSO: This is the official role Elon Musk will have in Donald Trump’s administration

Which Jobs Could Be Axed?

Although Musk has not provided a comprehensive list of the positions to be eliminated, he has hinted that specific roles within federal agencies and departments associated with science, technology, and energy may be prioritized for reduction. Among the positions Musk has indicated could potentially be eliminated are those linked to bureaucratic functions in organizations such as NASA, the Department of Energy (DOE), and the Renewable Energy Administration. Furthermore, he has indicated that the public sector should focus on core roles, eliminating positions he considers redundant.

1. Positions in Energy and Environmental Agencies

Musk has long criticized environmental policies, which, according to him, have failed to effectively push for renewable energy. As an advocate for clean and more efficient energy systems, Musk has argued that many government agency positions in charge of the environment would likely be removed. Above all, administrative roles within such sectors would be highly vulnerable to cuts.

2. Administrative Jobs at NASA and Space Agencies

Another area that Musk has identified as a potential domain for cuts is the space industry, where many bureaucratic positions within agencies like NASA could be eliminated. Musk, as the head of SpaceX and with a strong interest in private space exploration, has argued that space agencies should focus more on public-private cooperation and less on rigid hierarchical structures. This shift could lead to a reduction in job opportunities within the administration of NASA and other related agencies.

3. Department of Defense Administrative Roles

The Department of Defense is one area where Musk believes there is room for cuts. According to Musk, the military and relevant public administration should focus on increasing productivity while reducing the number of employees who are not directly involved in the operation and implementation of key projects.

Why These Cuts Might Be Necessary

Musk argues that reducing bureaucracy and cutting personnel in government agencies would create a leaner and more cost-effective government. He states that governments should only undertake core functions and avoid excessive spending that only increases the tax burden on citizens. Supporters of more efficient government, like Musk, believe that agencies should function more like businesses and that each employee should be actively involved in achieving clear objectives.

READ ALSO: The reason why Elon Musk’s transgender daughter is leaving the United States

Reactions to Musk’s Remarks

The idea of shrinking government employment has received some applause, particularly from those advocating for better government efficiency, but Musk’s viewpoint does not have unanimous support. Critics of his opinions argue that shrinking government is not always the best solution, especially in areas like science, technology, and defense, which require specialized knowledge.

For example, many government employee unions, such as the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), have voiced concerns that these cuts could eliminate positions that are truly needed and increase the workload for the remaining employees, further deteriorating government performance.

The Future of Federal Jobs: More Cuts Ahead?

The debate on government job cuts is part of a larger debate on the size and efficiency of the public sector. More and more, people are questioning whether traditional government jobs will be replaced by more automated or privatized systems, as automation, artificial intelligence, and other emerging technologies take center stage.

Ultimately, the job cuts Musk has proposed may represent merely the first phase of a deeper transformation within the public sector, the repercussions of which will predominantly be influenced by the progress of government policies and public reaction. Meanwhile, the government employees who may potentially be impacted by these changes are anticipating how the forthcoming months will unfold.

*This article was written in Spanish and translated with the help of AI.