TEHRAN – In a move that has sparked widespread controversy and disappointment, the Asian Football Confederation (AFC) has decided to strip Iran of its home advantage for an upcoming 2026 World Cup qualifier against Qatar. The match, originally scheduled to be held in Iran, will now take place at a neutral venue in the United Arab Emirates due to what the AFC has described as “prevailing security concerns.”

The Iranian Football Federation has vehemently protested this decision, arguing that the security situation in the country is stable and that there is no justifiable reason to relocate the match. The federation has also pointed out that other countries in the region have hosted international matches amid similar security concerns, raising questions about the impartiality of the AFC’s decision.

“We are deeply disappointed and stunned by the AFC’s decision,” said an Iranian football federation official. “We have provided ample evidence to demonstrate that Iran is a safe and secure host for international football matches. This decision seems to be politically motivated rather than based on genuine security concerns.”

Beyond the immediate impact on the Iran-Qatar match, the AFC’s decision has far-reaching consequences for Iranian football.

 Iranian clubs, including Persepolis, Esteghlal, Tractor, and Sepahan, have also been forced to play their home matches in the AFC Champions League at neutral venues. This has put these teams at a significant disadvantage, as they are deprived of the support of their home fans and the psychological boost that comes with playing on familiar turf.

Critics argue that the AFC’s decision sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the principles of fair play. They contend that the organization is applying double standards, as it has been more lenient in its assessments of security situations in other countries.

As Iranian football fans and officials continue to express their outrage over the AFC’s decision, it remains to be seen whether the organization will reconsider its stance. The controversy has raised serious questions about the AFC’s commitment to fair play and transparency.